Educator Onboarding
LEO Art Challenge Workshop
Satellite Tracking, Orbits, and Modeling
Workshop: Satellite Tracking, Orbits, and Modeling
Workshop: Trek-a-Sat
Workshop: Yerkes
Workshop: Electrostatics in Space - Carthage- Yerkes
Workshop: Life in Space! BTCI
Workshop: More Than a Rainbow - Yerkes
Workshop: Small Steps Teachimg Space Brings Giant Steps in Classrooms-SEEC
Workshop: 2017-01-28 Yerkes
Tools You Might Use
Educational Learning
Standards
Documentation
Rocket Engineering - MS (Grades 5-8)
Topic outline
-
Summer 2025
Collaborators: Jack Colvin (University of Chicago Intern)
Resources provided by Stevan Akerly (NSS Space Ambassadors Lead)
Loretta Hall (NSS Space Ambassador)
Kevin Simmons (NSS Space Ambassador & BLUECUBEAEROSPACE CEO)
Frances Dellutri (NSS Director of Education)
Background:
This lesson delves into the subject of rockets from an entirely different perspective than Rocket Math (https://spacedge.nss.org/course/view.php?id=334): not that of a mathematician, but rather that of an engineer. Specifically, this lesson explores the life and work of Robert Goddard – a brilliant engineer responsible for the development of the first successful rockets that worked based on liquid rather than solid fuel – as a case study of just how many engineering considerations go into designing something as complex as a rocket. In this lesson, we will explore Goddard’s work in detail, from his early solid-fuel rockets to his development of liquid propulsion, and finally to modern adaptations of his original design. In doing so, we will examine all the choices that go into creating a rocket, such as the materials and fuel used, tradeoffs between power and efficiency in various types of fuel (specifically focusing on solid vs liquid fuel), and how modern rockets have adapted Goddard’s system to be even more efficient in the modern day.
Lesson Goals:
Who is Robert Goddard and why is he important?
What are the differences and tradeoffs between liquid and solid fuel?
What engineering decisions go into designing rockets? How do different parts of rockets (motors, combustion chambers, exhaust nozzle, etc.) work?
Related Lessons:
Rocket Math High School and University: https://spacedge.nss.org/course/view.php?id=330
Rocketry Engineering High School and University:
https://spacedge.nss.org/course/view.php?id=326
Rocketry: https://spacedge.nss.org/course/view.php?id=51
Recent Space Developments: https://spacedge.nss.org/course/view.php?id=47#section-2
NGSS Standards:
MS-PS2-2,4
Science and Engineering Practices, Disciplinary Core Ideas, Crosscutting Concepts
MS-PS3-5
ETSI-1.A,B
Science and Engineering Practices, Disciplinary Core Ideas, Crosscutting Concepts
-

"I Climbed a tall cherry tree at the back of the barn ... and as I looked toward the fields at the east, I imagined how wonderful it would be to make some device which had even the possibility of ascending to Mars, and how it would look on a small scale, if sent up from the meadow at my feet. I have several photographs of the tree, taken since, with the little ladder I made to climb it, leaning against it"
-Robert H Goddard
This quote is an example of an "ah-ha" moment, a term used to desrcibe when someone has a sudden realization or moment of inspiration. These moments are often triggered by external factors, including the environment and the people around us, or a new piece of information that changes the way we are thinking about a problem. In Goddard's case, something about looking at the night sky with a serene, natural background around him made him realize that he wanted to devote his life to space travel.
These moments can take many shapes and sizes. They might be monumental realizations, like Goddard’s, or smaller, more personal insights, such as finally understanding a tricky math problem. The only common thread is that sudden, illuminating moment when your thoughts click into place and everything about a topic suddenly makes sense. -
Robert Goddard was born on October 5th, 1982, In Worcester, Massachusetts. Fascinated with the goal of humans someday being able to touch the skies, Goddard developed his first rocket, the bazooka, in 1917, which was a solid fuel rocket that used gunpowder to create an explosion and fire a projectile. His model was later refined to be used in WWII, but the key engineering concepts remained the same as in Goddard’s original design.
National Museum of American History, M1 Rocket Launcher, 1942, https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object/nmah_415906
Many of Goddard’s early rockets were simply adaptations of this original solid-fuel based design. One key benefit of solid fuel rockets is that they are fairly simple in design, and therefore Goddard could focus on making small tweaks in order to maximize efficiency. In order to work, solid fuel rocket engines need just three key components: a fuel source, which can be burned in order to produce the thrust that pushes the rocket forward, a source of oxygen, called an oxidizer, which prevents the reaction from burning out, and finally a location for the reaction to take place, called the combustion chamber. For solid fuel rockets, the fuel and oxidizer are mixed together, and are stored within the combustion chamber itself, which, as we will see, makes solid fuel rockets much easier to design and produce than engines that run on liquid fuel.
Activity: We call the reaction undergone in rockets where fuel is burned to release energy and exhaust - combustion. Watch the following videos about combustion reactions and how rocket engines work to better understand what is going on, and answer the following questions:
What “ingredients” do we have to put in to create a combustion reaction? What are the products of combustion?
What are some common fuel sources for combustion listed in the video?
What examples of combustion reactions other than rocket engines does the video list?
Throughout working on solid fuel rockets, Goddard was able to make significant improvements in his design. His first model rockets hardly even resembled rockets at all, instead looking more like sparse collections of metal piping. Over time, however, his designs began to look more like modern rockets, and simultaneously were able to produce much larger forces of thrust.
However, Goddard soon began realizing that solid fuel rockets have some significant downsides. Solid fuels are extremely heavy and take up a lot of space. Furthermore, they didn’t provide very much thrust compared to that large weight. Simply put, they were just not very good at moving rockets forward efficiently. Therefore, Goddard turned to trying to use liquid fuels to power his rockets. This was no easy task: in fact, before Goddard, no liquid fuel rocket had ever been successfully launched. However, liquid fuels had many promising upsides. They were lighter than solid fuels, took up less space, and most importantly, they provided way way more thrust per pound of fuel.
These images depict just how much Goddard’s rockets changed over time. The rocket on the right is his first ever solid fuel rocket, which consists just of an engine and a metal frame to give the rocket structure. The image on the left is his P-Type rocket, a much later model that used liquid instead of solid fuels. Goddard’s progression towards modern rocket design is evident.
-
As mentioned above, Goddard soon realized that solid fuel powered rockets come with a few major disadvantages. Firstly, they simply provide less thrust per pound of fuel. Furthermore, they are very difficult to control. Solid fuel rockets are said to be "not throttleable": There is no way to stop or control the combustion reaction once the fuel has been ignited, making it impossible to control the speed of the reaction once the rocket is airborne. All the fuel must be used in one go. Together, these concerns were enough to convince Goddard to design an entirely new rocket engine that used liquid instead of solid fuels.
Goddard’s liquid fuel rocket design was extremely revolutionary, but was also much more complex than his solid fuel design, and thus took many tweaks and changes to perfect. The basic design included 3 compartments: one that stored the liquid fuel, one for the oxidizer, and finally a combustion chamber where combustion would take place. Rather than being stored directly within the combustion chamber as in solid fuel engines, fuel and oxidizer could be stored in separate tanks and pumped into the combustion chamber at any rate, allowing full control over the rate of the combustion reaction itself.
Therefore, unlike solid fuel rockets, liquid fuel rockets are "throttleable": they can be slowed down or even stopped mid-flight in order to preserve fuel and ensure passenger safety. Following combustion, exhaust would then be pushed out of the back of the rocket to create thrust in the same way as in solid fuel rockets. Goddard completed and flew the first successful liquid-fuel rocket in 1929, but had design patents for his liquid fuel engine as early as 1919. Goddard worked with an extremely small team – just him and a couple colleagues – making this revolutionary invention all the more impressive.
Illustration by Nasa https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/lrockth-1.jpg
Understanding Question: Based on the above description and diagram, and the following video explaining how liquid propulsion works, can you think of some engineering challenges that Goddard might have faced during the development of liquid propulsion?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Throughout the process of developing this engine, Goddard constantly had to face significant engineering challenges. A prime example was how to deal with the extremely high temperatures generated in combustion. Goddard solved this problem in two ways. First of all, he used ceramic coating on all of this pipes. This is because ceramic heats up much slower than metal. Your are likely familiar with this fact: think about how much hotter metal gets than stone when baking in the sun on a hot day. Additionally, he created a revolutionary system that used the fuel itself to cool down the engine. Specifically, Goddard took advantage of the fact that he used liquid fuels that were stored at extremely low temperatures. Instead of pumping fuel directly into the combustion chamber, Goddard diverted a small portion of the fuel into a chamber that surrounded the engine. As the combustion reaction took place, that extra fuel would soak up a lot of the excess heat, preventing the engine from exploding or melting. Goddard received yet another patent for this system in 1914, which included the illustration depicted below.
Image 1: Goddard, Robert (1914), Apparatus for Pumping Low Temperature Liquids, US 1860891, USPTO, https://patents.google.com/patent/US1860891A/en?oq=US+1860891
Image 2: Brittanica . (1924). Robert Goddard. Encyclopedia Brittanica. Retrieved 2025, from https://www.britannica.com/science/space-exploration/History-of-space-exploration.
Similar engineering decisions had to be made for every single problem he encountered in his development process. Goddard had to design each compartment to perfection, choose the best and most efficient fuel source, and even design exactly how narrow or wide the nozzle of the rocket should be. These considerations were not just specific to the rocket, but also to the environment the rocket wold operate in. For example, engines designed to fire near sea level, such as booster rockets, have smaller nozzles to create a stronger exhaust stream, whereas engines designed to fire in space have wider nozzles, as they are more efficient when less immediate thrust is necessary.
Image 1: Brown, M. (1964). 15 DEGREE CONICAL NOZZLE - TITAN TRANSTAGE CONTOUR ENGINE - APOL. NASA Image Gallery. NASA. Retrieved 2025, from https://images.nasa.gov/details/GRC-1964-C-69633.
Image 2: NASA. (1992). STS-45 Atlantis, OV-104, lifts off from KSC Launch Complex (LC) Pad. NASA Image Gallery. Retrieved 2025, from https://images.nasa.gov/details/s45-s-055.
-
Opened: Tuesday, 19 August 2025, 12:00 AM
-
Opened: Wednesday, 20 August 2025, 12:00 AM
-
-
Both Solid Fuels and Liquid Fuels are used in the modern day, and thus the tradeoffs that Goddard was already weighing in the early 1900s are still relevant today. As we have seen, Liquid fuels offer more control and efficiency than solid fuels do. However, there are tradeoffs going the other direction as well. Liquid fuel engines are much more complicated to build. This means that they are more expensive to build, weigh more in machinery than solid fuel engines, and may even carry higher risk of pre-takeoff explosions or other similar complications.
Therefore, most modern rockets actually combine both of these models of propulsion in order to take advantage of the strengths of each while minimizing the drawbacks. For booster engines, which only need to provide one burst of thrust to get the rocket off the ground, most rockets use solid fuels in order to minimize cost. For later stages, where control and efficiency become more important, liquid fuels are often utilized. The following images are excepts of Goddard’s Diary in which he talks more about these tradeoffs. You can also watch the following video to get a more complete picture.
Goddard, R. (n.d.-b). 1938-1941 - Rockets with Turbopumps . Robert Goddard papers database provided by Microsearch Corporation www.microsearch.net. https://database.goddard.microsearch.net/Document?db=GODDARD-UNRESTRICTED&query=%28select%2B0%2B%28byhits%2B%28field%2BDOCUMENT%2B%28or%2B%28phrase%2Bliquid%2Bfuel%29%2B%28phrase%2Bsolid%2Bfuel%29%29%29%29%29
Video Resource: -
From his first solid-fuel prototypes to the groundbreaking launch of the world’s first liquid-fueled rocket, Robert Goddard revolutionized how humanity approached the problem of leaving Earth. His work was both revolutionary and visionary, introducing possibilities for space travel that had never even been considered before. What began as precarious assemblies of piping and fuel evolved into engines that could one day power interplanetary voyages.
Throughout this lesson, we’ve seen how engineering choices, from fuel type to nozzle design, are shaped by tradeoffs in efficiency, safety and control. We’ve explored how these principles continue to guide modern rocketry, and how Goddard’s original designs and principles are still central to modern rocketry.
If you would like to learn more about the amazing life of Robert H. Goddard, and rockets in general, the National Space Society has many additional resources that you can consult. You can take a look at the Goddard 100 project to see how contestants followed in Goddard’s footsteps by eloquently combining engineering, art, and the written word. (Goddard 100 Contest) Furthermore, you can visit (Goddard Contributions) to learn more about Goddard’s life and inspiration. Finally, You can consult other agencies, including the International Space Elevator Consortium, the International Space Exploration Coordination Group, or Government agencies and Universities that have studied Goddard’s work and life.
-
NSS Blog: An online blog containing posts about many space-related topics, including rockets and propulsion
https://nss.org/category/blog/
NSS Space Forum: a forum containing videos produced by NSS space ambassadors about anything space relatedhttps://nss.org/nss-space-forums/
Build your own model rockets through Estes rockets!
NASA Goddard Flight Center Website: A Website containing hundreds of math and engineering problems related to rocketry!
https://estesrockets.com/?
https://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov/SpaceMath.html
Math and Rockets in Sci Fi Movies (6:25 duration): A video discussing places where math and science show up in sci-fi movies!
A full video of a SpaceX Rocket Launch! (15:42 duration) -
Send a Postcard to Space through NSS Supported Blue Origin Club For The Future initiative!
Visit: SpacEdge Academy Postcards in Space Course
